Failures and opportunities in social media marketing

On Cnet is news about a new study by Gartner with the catching headline of a 50% failure rate:

75 percent of Fortune 1000 companies are eager to get involved in social-networking initiatives for marketing or customer relations purposes, but 50 percent of those campaigns will be classified as failures

The main problem is (oh wonder) the differing expectations about what will happen during those marketing efforts:

The quirkiest and most addictive campaigns often provide little value for the company and turn out to be fads, whereas marketing efforts on the Web often don’t go over as well with the public.

In addition, the report points out that online usage during the purchasing process of all products and services will increase:

Gartner’s research shows that by 2012 fully half of all purchases will have some online component. That could mean searching for product reviews, reading about a new product on a blog, or comparing prices even if the purchase is ultimately made in a store.

So the need to figure out win-win situations for brands and the community are ever more important.

And furthermore, a „heads up“ for online marketers for the financially difficult times ahead:

Businesses will turn to the Web to stay in touch with consumers during a difficult financial climate. “This is going to be a lifeline,” he said. “Your spirit of customers is probably the only thing you have.”

70% of print ads don’t have a URL!?

Just a quick note on a very curious fact – here is a quote of a recent finding:

I’m working on remake of I Am the Media, so I asked one of our bright and diligent researchers to do a count of the last 4 months of print campaigns on Ads of the World. And the gut feeling was confirmed. 70% of them didn’t contain any URL.

70%? This is absolutely amazing. Out of 256 print ads, only 77 Ads had a URL for more information.

Seems like the other campaigns weren’t really interested in providing further information. But why?

Stop campaining, start committing

Interesting presentation of Paul Isaakson on modern brand building.

The essence can be laid out in the two contraries:

Campaining = marketing for short term gains.
Committing = creating an evolving collection of coherent brand ideas and experiences over time.

Modern Brand Building

View SlideShare presentation or Upload your own. (tags: deepspace space150)

Just one sentence struck me as a bit strange:

Campaining = changing your core brand message to fit what you think people need or want to hear today so that they buy your product or service

Campaigns don’t always change core brand messages, do they? I surprised by that assumption…